Posts Tagged ‘Politics’

Founding Brothers, The Revolutionary Generation

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

by Joseph J. Ellis, audio book narrated by Nelson Runger, 2000  by Joseph J. Ellis, 2001 by Recorded Books, LLC

I enjoyed this book very much.  Ellis provides a picture of the revolutionary era and five of the primary figures: George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton.  He manages to inject some life into each of these individuals, some of whom died over two hundred years ago.  Ellis also provides great insight as to how we got to where we are today, especially when he describes the beginning of the political parties and partisan politics.  It is interesting to note the degree of partisanship that arose very quickly once George Washington stepped out of the public life.  Some of the accusations and character assassination that occurred between the Republicans (Jefferson’s party) and the Federalists (John Adams’ party) goes even further than what we are experiencing today.  According to Ellis, some of Jefferson’s and Madison’s actions during the presidency of John Adams even bordered on treason.

The othe subject on which Ellis sheds a great deal of light is the Constitution and what it actually contains.  The one question which was not fully resolved, according to Ellis, is the exact extent of the power of the national government versus the states.  According to many conservatives, the Constitution explicity reserves all powers to the states which are not specifically given to the federal government.  From the very start, however, this subject was argued, most eloquently by Adams, who favored a strong central government, and Jefferson, who argued that the power should be retained by the people in the form of states powere.  So it seems that even the individuals who were most involved in the writing of the original docuement did not agree on this subject.

The book flows very well and Ellis presents a great deal of new insight into the minds and personalities of these individuals. four stars

The Sellout, How Three Decades of Wall Street Greed and Government Mismanagement Destroyed the Global Financial System

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

by Charles Gasparino, 2009, Harper Business, New York

This book (lent to me by one of our friends in Florida) portrays the steps that led to the financial meltdown in the fall of 2008.  The tale is pretty fascinating as it traces the development of the original mortgage-backed securities back in the 1980′s to the crisis in the financial system they eventually caused.  The causes of the crisis, however, are complex and there is plenty of individuals who must share the blame.  What started out as a valid strategy using perfectly sound investment instruments eventually became what is now known as “toxic assets”.  How did this all happen?

Gasparino traces the greed and poor decisions of Wall Street executives, compounded by a well-meaning, but misplaced government policy (home ownership for everybody as a way to climb the economic ladder), that led to the meltdown.  What was surprising to me is that the big meltdown was preceded by many similar, but smaller meltdowns that seemed to occur with the Wall Street firms every few years.  As Gasparino cited the many instances of over leverage and poor decisions over the decades, the line from the song, “Where Have All the Flowers Gone?”, kept coming to mind: “When will they ever learn?”

In October of 2008 we were in Europe on a Danube River cruise.  I recall watching the TV at night as the meltdown went global.  This book, along with those memories, continue to remind me just how bad the situation was and how close we came to going into a deep depression, the likes of which we had never experienced.  I often wonder how there can be so many vocal critics of the “TARP” program, the bailouts, and the subsequent stimulus program.  There can be no question that some of these steps managed to avert a total meltdown.

I took over two months to read this book and it was tough read for me, not because of the actual writing, but, I think, due to the subject material.  It was just hard to read so much bad information and about such stupidity that led us into this situation.  If I had one criticism of the book, I would say that it was somewhat repetitive.  I felt as if I had already read some of the information several times before I finished the book.  Nevertheless, I would recommend this book to anyone who has an interest as to what caused the collapse of our financial systems.four stars

American Gospel, God, the Founding Fathers, and the Making of a Nation

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

 by Jon Meacham, 2007, read by Grover Gardiner, Random House Audiobook.

I got this audiobook from the library last fall to listen to in the car when we made our annual trip to Florida from Rhode Island.  I finally got around to finishing it.  I downloaded it onto my MP3 player and I listen to it while I walk.  The reason it took so long to listen to it is that I haven’t been doing a very good job of keeping up with my walking.  I will strive to do better in the future.

I was pretty harsh in my assessment of Meacham’s book on Andrew Jackson (Review), but he does a pretty good job on this one.  He apparently spends a lot of time observing the American scene and those observations on current religious practice and tone, coupled with his research on American religion, ring fairly true.  His contention is that we do have a “public” religion in the United States that is a part of the fabric of American society and that it is essentially a good thing.  Furthermore, despite the concept of separation of church and state, it is not about to go away.  On the other hand, this public religion is a very watered down kind of religion and is definately not the kind of religion that evangelical Christians would like to impose on our government and schools.

Meacham walks us through the use of religion throughout our history to provide some perspective on this view of religion in the public sector.  The examples he cites are interesting, even though the points that he makes seem to be a bit obvious.  I left the book thinking that if only more individuals would accept the premises that he outlines and not attempt to take it further, we would certainly have a much more tolerant society than that which we seem to encounter these days.  Some persons feel that Christianity is under attack in our country and their response seems to be to try to insert it into our government and schools.  Meacham makes the case that a form of public religion exists in our government institutions and has been there from the inception of our republic.  In his view, there isn’t much need to extend it further.

As I mentioned above, the book sometimes seems to state the obvious, but it is interesting nonetheless.  3 1/2 stars

Building the Collier County Economy

Monday, January 26th, 2009

The following is a letter to the editor that I submitted to the Naples Daily News on Sunday, January 25.

I read with interest Sunday’s Guest Commentary, “Building economy that won’t rely on population growth”, by Tammie Nemecek.  While I applaud the efforts of the Economic Development Council and the 37 community groups and organizations, I wonder if enough attention is being given to the medical industry in our county.  As I perused the list of Project Innovation endorsers provided in the commentary, I was struck by the fact that our local hospitals and other medical providers were not listed.

I am concerned that we may be attempting to create some new industries from scratch in Collier County that already exist in many other communities throughout the United States and the world such as computer software, communications, etc., while there exists a real need for top-notch medical services and technology in our area.  We are blessed with a large population of retirees who live here either year-round or part of the year, but the medical infrastructure to support those individuals seems only to exist elsewhere.  I have one friend who recently had a brain implant to help control his Parkinson’s disease, performed at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville.  I have another friend who had a heart valve replacement, performed at the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland.  One of our major hospitals in Naples offers only a limited cardiac care program and is not licensed to perform open-heart surgery.  This facility also out-sources some of its routine laboratory work to facilities in other parts of the state rather than doing all of it locally.  It is indicative of our failure to aggressively support the establishment of a world-class facility that the Cleveland Clinic threw in the towel and pulled out of our area a couple of years ago.  The current migration of family practitioners in Collier County to “concierge” service also reflects our inability to attract and retain primary care physicians and further limits access to exceptional health care for many individuals.

I grew up in small town in Minnesota that was 40 miles from Rochester, Minnesota, home to the Mayo Clinic.  We often referred to that clinic as “the mecca”, as it attracted patients from all over the world.  By contrast, I have heard the joke as to where to go around here to get the best medical care.  Answer: Southwest Regional Airport.

We are blessed with possibly the best climate in which to undergo medical treatment and subsequent rehabilitation.  We also have potentially the optimum clientele who are in need of such services.  Rather than attempt to compete in some of the industries where world-wide competition already exists and where Collier County may not bring any new natural resources to the table, I believe we should be looking to put our best foot forward in this vital sector where we can truly leverage our local strengths and needs.

Term Limits

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

by Vince Flynn, 1997

This is a very good thriller about assassinations of politicians in Washington, D.C.  The characters are pretty good, although a tad bit overdone in some cases, and the plot moves right along and is, for the most part, believable.

I recommend this book for an enjoyable read if for no other reason. 3 1/2 stars

Reconciliation, Islam, Democracy, and the West

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

by Banazir Bhutto, 2008, HarperCollins Publishers, New York

Banazir Bhutto finished this book shortly before she died in an attack on her car in Pakistan.  The book is an overview of the problems facing the Muslim world and its relationship with the West.  While placing the bulk of blame for the current sad state of democracies in the Muslim world on internal factions, she also cites many policy missteps on the part of the West that have contributed to this situation.

Despite the current poor relations between most of the Muslim world and the West, Bhutto shows that democracy and Islam are not incompatible.  She has a strong belief that democratic governments and processes are the only hope to stave off extremism and terrorism.

Bhutto focused mostly on political structure, however, and did not seem to contemplate some of the cultural differences between the West and Islam countries.  There are many aspects of Western culture that could make Western democracy difficult for many fundamentalist Muslims to accept.  In the United States, for instance, we have a stronger focus on the individual rather than the community.  The capitalist economic model we have embraced in our Western democratic model may not appeal to many Muslims who may be rooted in a more family or tribal-centric model.  Lastly, our popular culture seems to celebrate many vices that seem to be incompatible with the teachings of Islam: alcohol, drugs, nudity, etc.

Bhutto was educated at Harvard and references many of her experiences as a student there as being liberating.   I am not sure the poorest Pakistanis can relate to these kinds of experiences.  Perhaps some kind of modified, non-Western brand of democracy could developed to provide the relief from dictatorship and extremism that is so badly needed in the Islamic world.  To ignore the cultural issues and focus solely on political solutions may not be the answer.

I found the reading of this book to be extremely tiresome.  It reminded me of a term paper in college.  She definitely was passionate about what she believed, but it there seemed to be some difficulty in translating this passion to paper.

The loss of  Bhutto to Pakistan is substantial.  Given the state of affairs in that country, however, it is difficult to predict that she would have been successful in translating her beliefs and ideas into lasting change.2 1/2 stars

Blame Us

Wednesday, April 16th, 2008

I sent the following letter to the Naples Daily News (Florida) and it was published on April 12, 2008, except for the last sentence:

I am amazed at the misdirection of blame for the primary mess that has befallen Florida.

For example, The Naples Daily News published an editorial a few weeks ago implying that the Democratic National Committee is to blame for the disenfranchisement of Florida primary voters; and many articles and letters to the editors are of the same opinion.

I have another view of who caused the problem. We, the voters and citizens of Florida, are to blame. Through our elected senators and representatives (Republican and Democrat) who passed this bill, and our elected governor (Republican) who signed the bill, we moved the Florida primary from March where it rightfully belonged to January 29, 2008. Both the Republican and Democratic National Committees which, by law had the power to set the rules, had already established that a primary election on January 29 would lead to the disqualification of delegates. In the case of the Republican primary, it didn’t really matter because John McCain won the nomination by a wide margin. In the case of the Democratic primary, the action by our elected legislators and governor has resulted in the disenfranchisement of Florida voters.

The media has reported that some Florida legislators were “livid” and were “fulminating” about the DNC’s position. The media has given the true culprits a pass. They are, in fact, we the voters and our elected officials.

We should all take responsibility for the fact that we again blew it as we did in 2000.  We should do this by rightfully pointing the blame at those legislators who supported this bill and the governor who signed it into law.

Evolution and Why it Matters in the 2008 Presidential Race

Sunday, December 9th, 2007

There has been much discussion lately regarding the religion of a particular candidate for president.  Also, many groups are using the issues of abortion and gay marriage as litmus tests to determine if a particular candidate is, in their view, qualified to be president.

I don’t believe religion, abortion, or gay marriage really matter as long as a person is not too aggressive in imposing his or her beliefs on others.  Those particular issues are all based on a particular set of values and beliefs.  It is very difficult to discern which set of values and beliefs is “correct”, “true”, or “valid” simply because they are values and beliefs.  A good person, in my opinion, can be a Mormon, a Catholic, a Protestant, an Evangelist, a Jew, a Muslim, etc.  Likewise, a person of good character can be pro-choice or anti-abortion, or a good person can be for or against gay marriage.

 A person of good character can also either accept or reject the theory of evolution.  The difference, however, is that evolution theory has been substantiated by over 100 years of scientific knowledge and thought.  There are certainly some holes still left in the theory and if an individual ignores the bulk of the evidence and wishes to give more weight to his or her beliefs regarding evolution, I have no problem with that … unless the individual is the President of the United States.  The office of the President requires a person who can weigh the evidence and facts of each situation and make rational decisions as to the best course of action.  I don’t feel that someone who does not accept the theory of evolution fits that description.

The office of the President sometimes requires that the person who occupies it be able to make quick, rational decisions under extreme pressure.  Can somebody in that office who does not even accept the evidence in favor of evolution make good decisions in complex situations such as the Cuban missile crisis?  I would question that.

I ordinarily don’t like litmus tests to determine if a candidate is worthy of my vote for President, but when a candidate professes to reject the theory of evolution, I think that is where I will draw the line.

State of Denial, Bush at War, Part III

Saturday, February 17th, 2007

by Bob Woodward, 2006

This book definitely does not have as much impact as All the President’s Men, which was instrumental in driving Richard Nixon out of office.  It does, however, shed a great deal of light on what has happened over the last couple of years when we were supposedly “making progress” in Iraq.

I was especially struck by the portrait presented of Don Rumsfeld.  History may eventually determine that Rumsfeld was right in most of his ideas: streamlining the military to provide a quicker and more accurate response, making the Iraqis stand up and take responsibility, fewer rather than more troops.  Unfortunately, his terrible management style and inability to work as a team member were key ingredients leading to failure.  George Bush, unfortunately, was not competent enough to recognize the impacts early enough to make a timely correction.

Having been in the business world for many years, I recognize some of the characteristics of these types of managers.  They are the ones who are always right and seem to be unfazed by the results of their poor decisions.  The difference is that a business can lose money or even fold and that is too bad.  In the case of a nation, it is a disaster. four stars

The World is Flat, A Brief History of the 20th Century

Monday, December 25th, 2006

By Thomas L. Friedman, 2005

Most of this book is an overview of the technological advances of the past few years which have allowed the world to collaborate on various types of work projects leading to a new globalization of trade.

As I was reading the book, I was already familiar with many of the tools that he described, but he filled in a lot of the blanks and provided some interesting history as to how these things evolved and gave some insight regarding the individuals who were responsible for their invention.  On the other hand, I thought that the author was overselling the benefits of the new technology in that he made it appear as if they were going to lead us all to some kind of utopian global trade situation.  I kept asking myself, if this is so, why is the world in such a mess?

Friedman redeemed himself in the last part of the book, however, when he outlined the reasons why a good part of the world, primarily the Islamic world, is not buying into the new globalization.  He correctly describes the sources of the cultural divide and is much less optimistic about whether it can ever be overcome.  Because of this more realistic and sobering view, I have much more respect for his overall assessment.  four stars